NEW IDEAS ARE NEEDED TO UNIFY ALL OF THE FORCES

In a recent article, written by Dr. Steven Weinberg of the University of Texas at Austin, entitled “A UNIFIED PHYSICS BY 2050”, and published in the SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, December 1999 issue, the introductory heading emphasized:

“Experiments at CERN and elsewhere should let us complete the Standard Model of particle physics, BUT A UNIFIED THEORY OF ALL FORCES WILL PROBABLY REQUIRE RADICALLY NEW IDEAS.”

The article continues with comments and references to past attempts at UNIFICATION, such as the following:

“Einstein devoted the last 30 years of his life to an unsuccessful search for a “unified field theory,” which would unite general relativity, his own theory of space-time and gravitation, with Maxwell’s theory of electromagnetism.”

“They (scientists) found that calculations using quantum field theory (Standard Model) kept producing infinite quantities, a situation that usually means a theory is badly flawed or is being pushed beyond its limits of validity.”

“In particular, the principle of renormalizability, together with various symmetry principles of the Standard Model, rules out unobserved processes such as the decay of isolated protons and forbids the neutrinos from having masses.”

“Observations of this kind will yield valuable clues to the unified theory of all forces, but the discovery of this theory will probably not be possible without radically new ideas”

“Two great obstacles stand in the way of the of this task. One is that we do not know what physical principles govern the fundamental theory.”

“How can we get the ideas we need to formulate a truly fundamental theory, when this theory is to describe a realm where all intuitions derived from life in space-time become inapplicable?”

“The other obstacle is that even if we were able to formulate a fundamental theory, we might not know how to use it to make predictions that could confirm its validity.”

“It is impossible to say when these problems will be overcome. They may be solved in a preprint put out tomorrow by some young theorists. They may not be solved by 2050, or even 2150. But when they are solved, even though we cannot do experiments at 1016 GeV or look into higher dimensions, we will not have any trouble in recognizing the truth of the fundamental unified theory.”

“The discovery of a unified theory that describes the nature at all energies will put us in a position to answer the deepest questions of cosmology.”

“This will not be the end of physics. - - - - But it will mark the end of a certain kind of physics: the search for a unified theory that entails all other facts of physical science.”

Several researchers who have studied my work believe that it may contain the radical new ideas necessary to solve these problems. The work specifically describes dozens of tests, that if undertaken by the appropriate facilities such as CERN, Stanford LAC or Fermi Labs, the primary principles of the work will be confirmed.

The reason that physicists were unsuccessful in their attempts at unification is because the FUNDAMENTAL GEATRON PARTICLES were not discovered until the late 20th century.

Similar problems, as those emphasized above, do not exist with the GEATRON THEORIES of this work. In fact, the principles of the Geatron Theories provide precise and calculable results with all particle experiments.

We know that practically every particle and theoretical physicist on our planet is searching to establish the existence of a neutrino with mass. The Geatron Theories of this work prove that the neutrino possesses mass and states it precisely.

I hope that this new work will enlighten the reader with the knowledge of exactly what physical principles govern the fundamental theory. It demonstrates the simplistic beauty of the new field of physics, designated by the author as Fundamental Physics, where intuitions remain applicable with the Geatron Theories.

How convenient would it be if a young theorists completed this task in 1999 instead of 2150? The Theory of THE ORDER OF THE FORCES, containing the many GEATRON THEORIES has accomplished the prescribed tasks and desired goals with the UNIFICATION OF ALL OF THE FORCES AND WITH A CONTINUATION TO THE FORMATION OF MATTER.

Dr. Steven Weinberg has made numerous contributions to the sciences. His honest and informative portrayal of the present obstacles confronting physicists from around the world clearly demonstrates a need to embark into new directions of study. I should like to point out that Dr. Weinberg received a Nobel Prize in Physics in 1979 and the National Medal of Science in 1991.

After you have had an opportunity to review this work, I would appreciate any comments that you would care to share with me, whether negative or positive. It is my hope that you and your colleagues will obtain some lasting benefit from this work.

Brown University professor of physics and engineering, Humphrey Maris, proposes  that it is possible to split the electron. A paper describing the theory appears in the Aug. 1 Journal of Low Temperature Physics. Maris presented his research at the International Conference on Quantum Fluids and Solids, held in June at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis.

Several colleagues have suggested that I bring the public up to date with some new developments related to my work in particle physics. It appears that the results of several recent experiments at Brown University have proven major aspects of my work. Dr. Humphrey Maris and his team, while zapping liquid He4 with infrared light obtained an unexpected result. It appeared that an electron split into two parts, with each part suspended in separate bubbles. These experiments and results were announced on August 1, 2000. Naturally, this observation was shocking, as it not only defied The Standard Model Theory, but also placed quarks into a new category, that of the Non-existent. Moreover, the results have proven that the electron
is a composite entity rather than a virtual finite entity, which is one of the major principles of my work.

According to statements by Maris, Modern Theory has no explanation for these results. However, my work not only predicted these results many years ago, but easily explains the products, as follows:

Electron Composition:

The Electron is composed of 3-Stages, with each Stage composed of 9 Geatron particles of energy, with each particle possessing a Mass of: m = 0.018926578 MeV/c2 Pfc, for a total of 27 fundamental Geatron particles of energy contained within the electrons' configuration.

Each Stage has a Mass of: m = 0.170339202 MeV/c2

During Maris’s experiment, after exposure to low frequency Infrared Light, the electron split into two as described by the Geatron principles:

1) Stage I and II remained intact yielding a Mass of m = 0.340678404 MeV/c2 and possessing a neutral charge due to the cancellation of charges between Stages I and II.

2) Stage III, which is loosely held or bound, as compared to Stages I & II, dislodged yielding a Mass of m = 0.170339202 MeV/c2 and possessing a negative electric charge.

The experiments of Dr. Maris yielded an unexpected result leading to an obvious conclusion, "the composite nature of the electron". However, my work predates that of Dr. Maris by several years and not only predicted the results he obtained, but also is capable of explaining the exact results in terms of resultant mass and electric charge, and the exact sequence of electron fragmentation that will occur at various input energy levels.