Mr. Pamfiloff's work, "The Order of The Forces with The Grand Unifying Theory and The Fundamental Particle," presents an entirely new approach to particle physics. His is a theory that combines an elegant, yet powerful simplicity that is consistent with all experimental evidence. He challenges the current and generally accepted theories of the Standard Model in the same way Copernicus challenged the generally accepted theories of the universe of his day.

In the case of the standard model of the universe in the early 1500's, there was a basic theory of how the stars and planets moved around the heavens. Unfortunately, each time the methods of observation improved, new contradictions to the standard model of the day were observed. Rather than question the fundamental suitability of the theory, the scientists of the day "adjusted" the model with layers upon layers of amendments, each one adding complications upon complications, wheels within wheels. Copernicus completely refuted the standard model and offered a far simpler and ultimately proven correct theory to replace it. At first, his theory
was rejected, not because there were errors with it but rather because it contradicted the articles of faith and belief.

Today, the Standard Model of particle physics is a theory that has been contradicted with every advancement in the ability to look deeper into the structure of matter. Each new contradiction has been explained away with the addition of a new theoretical member, or set of members, of the particulate zoo. Rather than question the fundamental suitability of the current theory of matter and elemental forces, the scientists of today adjust the Standard Model with layers upon layers of amendments, each one adding complications upon complications, wheels within wheels. Currently, there are, I believe, 419 different elementary particles and forces that must come together to create four not-so-simple particles that have withstood the tests of time: the proton, neutron, electron, and photon. Imagine, 419 "things" required to build only four "things," and nothing is left over. It seems counter-intuitive. God must have been very busy on creation day.

Mr. Pamfiloff states that there is only one fundamental "thing," with a limited number of properties, that is required to make the four not-so-simple particles that have withstood the tests of time. He has shown how combinations of that one fundamental particle can explain all of the properties of matter and all of the forces known in the universe. He has applied his theories to the results of numerous experiments in the realm of particle physics and has found perfect matches between predictions and results. His theory is consistent with Occam's Razor that the simplest solution is usually the right one.

Unfortunately, if history is any guide, Mr. Pamfiloff's theory will be rejected, at least initially, by most of today's scientists, not because there were errors with it but rather because his theory contradicted the current articles of faith and belief. Those who refuse to consider, to test, and to fairly evaluate his theory fall into the category of those many other justly forgotten "scientists"of history who ridiculed Copernicus, Columbus, Galileo and others who challenged the dogma of their days. With luck, there may be some scientists who would rather be correct than stubborn and loud, even if they do have to backtrack a little to get on the right path.

Subject: RE: The Order Of The Forces
Date: Mon, 08 May 2000 21:19:38 -0500
From:  "xxxxxxxxx x. xxxxxxx" <xxxxxxxx@uno.edu>
To: Eugene Pamfiloff <boris@2xtreme.net>

Dear Dr. Pamfiloff,

It has been a while since you heard from me.  I finished the book but I keep finding myself reaching for it quite frequently, an astonishing work!  It seems to me that you are truly onto something here!  What you need now is more exposure to get other people thinking.

Best wishes,

xxxxxxxxx x. xxxxxxx
Department of Geology and Geophysics
University of New Orleans
New Orleans, Louisiana 70148

Subject: GUT
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2000 14:26:23 -0700
From: xxxx xxxxx <xxxxxx@socrates.berkeley.edu>
To: boris@2xtreme.net

Dear Dr. Pamfiloff,

I have read or skimmed thru most of your manuscript on particle physics and certainly found it to be a bold venture!

Before giving you my reactions, let me preface my comments by stating that it has been several years since I have worked in theoretical elementary particle physics.  In the interim, I have been doing a mix of theoretical and exmperimental work in ecology and environmental science, altho my recent work appears to be of some relevance in the physics of turbulence and spin-spin models (the so-called X-Y model) of magnetism. Most of what I knew in particle physics has stuck with me, but I am not up to date on some of the recent developments.

Seems to me you have created a set of building block concepts that may characterize the creatures in the zoo, but in a way that is the easy part – there is a long way to go before it can claim to describe the real guts of high energy physics which is cross sections, elastic and inelastic form factors (structure functions),  and all the other experimental knowledge that has accumulated.  Moreover, there has to be a way to connect the concepts you introduced to an analytical framework (such as QFT) for calculating the effects of interactions.

I believe that to capture the attention of the physics community you would have to imbed your ideas in a consistent calculational scheme and come up with one or more definitive, dramatic (non-trivial) predictions that could be tested in accelerator expts.   Testable stringent predictions are the currency of science, as you well know.

I wish I could be more encouraging, because I know you had a great deal of pleasure thinking this all through!

Cheers-Dr. xxxx xxxxx
University of California, Berkeley

Subject: Re: book
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2000 16:42:56 +0100
From: "xxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xxxxxxxxxxxxxx@amsterdam.fcb.com>
Reply-To: xxxxx@amsterdam.fcb.com
To: Eugene Pamfiloff <boris@2xtreme.net>
References: 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6

Dear Eugene:

I just finished reading your book: YOU-ARE-A-GENIUS!

I've read quite some "new theories", but none makes as much sense or is as complete as yours. ( The 5 (!) string theories, M-theory etc, that have been around a couple decades, but don't seem to be going anywhere in a hurry)

I've got a feeling that you're lightyears ahead of the rest of the physics community. My only hope is that you may be around long enough (don't know your age) to get a taste of recognition, or at least serious consideration of your work.

Looks like it takes an engineer to unravel the machinations of the physical world.

Of course I've only read (as opposed to studied) your work and I'll have to read it several more times after this. I can still say that it's the biggest avalanche of beautiful ideas that I've experienced in a very long time.

I'll send you my copy for signing asap!

With highest regards,

Mark

Subject: Re: book
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2000 09:57:04 +0100
From: "xxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xxxxxxxxxxxxxx@amsterdam.fcb.com>
Reply-To: xxxxx@amsterdam.fcb.com
To: Eugene Pamfiloff <boris@2xtreme.net>
References: 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6

Dear Eugene:

You might be pleased to know that I have ordered two more copies of your book. A very good friend of mine is related to two phycisists in Holland. Shimon Vega, who does research at the Weitzman Institute and his stephfather Eljah Mendels. Who knows what may come out of it...

best regards,

Mark

Reviewer: Armond V Pelissetti from California

I have just completed the reading of THE ORDER OF THE FORCES WITH THE GRAND UNIFYING THEORY AND THE FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLE and I am amazed at the brilliance of the author and his ability to explain these complex theories so clearly. "Revolutionary" is an understatement. Heretofore our experts in physics have laboured within the confinements of antiquated thinking, now we have an innovator who has presented the academic community a challenge. Will the scientists and professors be able to expand their scope? I truly doubt it! Change evolves slowly and will be resisted by ignorance, shortsightedness and self-serving arrogance.

Unfortunately, I see this scholar/author long dead before this work becomes the "bible" in this field. GRAVITY, MAGNETISM: the WHY has never been explained before in any university, in any other book. With this specific subjectmatter. Mr. Pamfiloff has done this and made his offer of proof. I am amazed that it has taken centuries for one man to finally find the answers. It takes vision, intelligence and courage to explore the theoretical world and to present it as a gift to mankind, knowing that the response may be rejection. Perhaps I will revise my pessimistic outlook regarding the ability of the academic community to comprehend the importance of this work. But that revision will only occur after observing their response.

There is an optimistic note, however, I can see practical application for these theories which can revolutionize the world in terms of power and reduction for the dependency on fossil fuel. In these pages there is the clear hint of application; the business community will see this and there is a possibility, no, a probability that the principles will be put into action and the academic community will trudge along after the fact. I look forward to further works by Mr. Pamfiloff, or a revision of this book with substantial labratory proof which could not be ignored. I thank this author for opening my eyes and for the hope of immense progress he presents to our world.